Talk:Katie Fleming - Revision history

Tim Arnold: And that

2008-09-22T11:45:14Z

And that

Tim Arnold at 18:45, 21 September 2008

2008-09-21T18:45:19Z

Ostercy at 12:55, 21 September 2008

2008-09-21T12:55:18Z

Tim Arnold at 23:02, 20 September 2008

2008-09-20T23:02:19Z

Ostercy at 15:46, 20 September 2008

2008-09-20T15:46:26Z

Ostercy at 15:46, 20 September 2008

2008-09-20T15:46:04Z

Tim Arnold at 13:37, 20 September 2008

2008-09-20T13:37:13Z

Ostercy at 12:32, 20 September 2008

2008-09-20T12:32:26Z

Ostercy: Deleted what I wrote - it was pointless and I think it's time this debate died a death :)

2008-09-20T07:37:30Z

Deleted what I wrote - it was pointless and I think it's time this debate died a death :)

Ostercy at 07:05, 20 September 2008

2008-09-20T07:05:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:45, 22 September 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:

	As you've probably seen, your suggestions at the other Wiki were not accepted I'm afraid.[[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 14:55, 21 September 2008 (CEST)		As you've probably seen, your suggestions at the other Wiki were not accepted I'm afraid.[[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 14:55, 21 September 2008 (CEST)
−	:That is disappointing - by the "wikisysop" no less. I take your point now. [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 20:45, 21 September 2008 (CEST)	+	:That is disappointing - by the "wikisysop" no less (wow, I also got blocked for "Inserting nonsense/gibberish into pages"). I take your point now. [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 20:45, 21 September 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 21 September 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:

	As you've probably seen, your suggestions at the other Wiki were not accepted I'm afraid.[[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 14:55, 21 September 2008 (CEST)		As you've probably seen, your suggestions at the other Wiki were not accepted I'm afraid.[[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 14:55, 21 September 2008 (CEST)
		+	:That is disappointing - by the "wikisysop" no less. I take your point now. [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 20:45, 21 September 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 21 September 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:As you suggest I'll now be doing some real content in this wiki (which is in my opinion the original and best anyway :) [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 01:02, 21 September 2008 (CEST)		:As you suggest I'll now be doing some real content in this wiki (which is in my opinion the original and best anyway :) [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 01:02, 21 September 2008 (CEST)
		+
		+	As you've probably seen, your suggestions at the other Wiki were not accepted I'm afraid.[[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 14:55, 21 September 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:02, 20 September 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:

	I'd leave that Wiki to its own devices if I was you and spend your time working on this one. The only reason they included me was so that they could defame me :) They made no mention of my writing or my other contributions to fan fiction. [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 17:46, 20 September 2008 (CEST)		I'd leave that Wiki to its own devices if I was you and spend your time working on this one. The only reason they included me was so that they could defame me :) They made no mention of my writing or my other contributions to fan fiction. [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 17:46, 20 September 2008 (CEST)
		+
		+	: Well I fixed it up as best I could anyway - we'll see how long it lasts. Anyhow, I consider my work ensuring the various wikis are accurate regarding this stuff to be done now - though I will just say I find this dialogue from TR Legend quite appropriate for that whole mess ;)
		+
		+	<blockquote>
		+	"He tried ''so'' hard. And they hated him for it."<br>
		+	"No one hated him, Lara."<br>
		+	"It bloody well wasn't love, was it? His reputation was destroyed. Now there's more than one thing to be salvaged from that mountain top."
		+	</blockquote>
		+
		+	:As you suggest I'll now be doing some real content in this wiki (which is in my opinion the original and best anyway :) [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 01:02, 21 September 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 20 September 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	: Ah, my mistake - I thought you were relying on it for its actual content (although I remain convinced it should not be included if we're to kill this once and for all). I plan on attempting to clear up ''that'' wiki too at some point - it's frankly ridiculous that you and Katie are assumed the only two authors "of note" on that page. [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 15:37, 20 September 2008 (CEST)		: Ah, my mistake - I thought you were relying on it for its actual content (although I remain convinced it should not be included if we're to kill this once and for all). I plan on attempting to clear up ''that'' wiki too at some point - it's frankly ridiculous that you and Katie are assumed the only two authors "of note" on that page. [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 15:37, 20 September 2008 (CEST)

−	I'd leave that Wiki to its own devices if I was you and spend your time working on this one. The only reason they included me was so that they could defame me :) They made no mention of my writing or my other contributions to fan fiction[[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 17:46, 20 September 2008 (CEST)	+	I'd leave that Wiki to its own devices if I was you and spend your time working on this one. The only reason they included me was so that they could defame me :) They made no mention of my writing or my other contributions to fan fiction. [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 17:46, 20 September 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 20 September 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Tim - I agree with you about not including Wikis generally as references. I included that particular one since it seems to me to be biased and illustrated that for some people the whole debate is still a live issue. But I bow to your suggestion that we don't give it "the oxygen of publicity" :) [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 14:32, 20 September 2008 (CEST)		Tim - I agree with you about not including Wikis generally as references. I included that particular one since it seems to me to be biased and illustrated that for some people the whole debate is still a live issue. But I bow to your suggestion that we don't give it "the oxygen of publicity" :) [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 14:32, 20 September 2008 (CEST)
	: Ah, my mistake - I thought you were relying on it for its actual content (although I remain convinced it should not be included if we're to kill this once and for all). I plan on attempting to clear up ''that'' wiki too at some point - it's frankly ridiculous that you and Katie are assumed the only two authors "of note" on that page. [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 15:37, 20 September 2008 (CEST)		: Ah, my mistake - I thought you were relying on it for its actual content (although I remain convinced it should not be included if we're to kill this once and for all). I plan on attempting to clear up ''that'' wiki too at some point - it's frankly ridiculous that you and Katie are assumed the only two authors "of note" on that page. [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 15:37, 20 September 2008 (CEST)
		+
		+	I'd leave that Wiki to its own devices if I was you and spend your time working on this one. The only reason they included me was so that they could defame me :) They made no mention of my writing or my other contributions to fan fiction[[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 17:46, 20 September 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 20 September 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Tim - I agree with you about not including Wikis generally as references. I included that particular one since it seems to me to be biased and illustrated that for some people the whole debate is still a live issue. But I bow to your suggestion that we don't give it "the oxygen of publicity" :) [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 14:32, 20 September 2008 (CEST)		Tim - I agree with you about not including Wikis generally as references. I included that particular one since it seems to me to be biased and illustrated that for some people the whole debate is still a live issue. But I bow to your suggestion that we don't give it "the oxygen of publicity" :) [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 14:32, 20 September 2008 (CEST)
		+	: Ah, my mistake - I thought you were relying on it for its actual content (although I remain convinced it should not be included if we're to kill this once and for all). I plan on attempting to clear up ''that'' wiki too at some point - it's frankly ridiculous that you and Katie are assumed the only two authors "of note" on that page. [[User:Tim Arnold\|Tim Arnold]] 15:37, 20 September 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 20 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I realise that people will think I'm the very last person to write Katie Fleming's entry but since I still get emails accusing me of hating her (I don't) as well as disingenuous entries on less objective Wikipedia suggesting that I'm responsible for all sorts of things that I'm not responsible for with regard to Katie, I thought I'd have a go at starting off this article. Of course, Wiki Raider can edited by anyone, so if you disagree with what I have written - change it. Just please don't send me any more hate mail or write any more bizarre things about me on your websites if you disagree :). Thanks [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 10:55, 17 September 2008 (CEST)		I realise that people will think I'm the very last person to write Katie Fleming's entry but since I still get emails accusing me of hating her (I don't) as well as disingenuous entries on less objective Wikipedia suggesting that I'm responsible for all sorts of things that I'm not responsible for with regard to Katie, I thought I'd have a go at starting off this article. Of course, Wiki Raider can edited by anyone, so if you disagree with what I have written - change it. Just please don't send me any more hate mail or write any more bizarre things about me on your websites if you disagree :). Thanks [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 10:55, 17 September 2008 (CEST)
		+
		+	Tim - I agree with you about not including Wikis generally as references. I included that particular one since it seems to me to be biased and illustrated that for some people the whole debate is still a live issue. But I bow to your suggestion that we don't give it "the oxygen of publicity" :) [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 14:32, 20 September 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:37, 20 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I realise that people will think I'm the very last person to write Katie Fleming's entry but since I still get emails accusing me of hating her (I don't) as well as disingenuous entries on less objective Wikipedia suggesting that I'm responsible for all sorts of things that I'm not responsible for with regard to Katie, I thought I'd have a go at starting off this article. Of course, Wiki Raider can edited by anyone, so if you disagree with what I have written - change it. Just please don't send me any more hate mail or write any more bizarre things about me on your websites if you disagree :). Thanks [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 10:55, 17 September 2008 (CEST)		I realise that people will think I'm the very last person to write Katie Fleming's entry but since I still get emails accusing me of hating her (I don't) as well as disingenuous entries on less objective Wikipedia suggesting that I'm responsible for all sorts of things that I'm not responsible for with regard to Katie, I thought I'd have a go at starting off this article. Of course, Wiki Raider can edited by anyone, so if you disagree with what I have written - change it. Just please don't send me any more hate mail or write any more bizarre things about me on your websites if you disagree :). Thanks [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 10:55, 17 September 2008 (CEST)
−
−	Just to be clear - and there is ample documentation to back this page up - it wasn't the inclusion of Katie and various other people in the credits of Anniversary that sparked comment. It was the GameTap interview. And also to be clear - the controversy was about the "news blackout" coordinated across two or three TR forums on people who wanted to discuss it (not only myself I might add), for which there is also ample documentation. It wasn't about Katie-bashing or envy of Katie, and the (continuing) effort to portray the controversy as all about Katie was (and is) an attempt to divert attention away from the Admins of various forums and to stir up the legion of Katie fans in order to obscure the issue. The description of the controversy given here is not biased - it is merely factual. [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 09:05, 20 September 2008 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:05, 20 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I realise that people will think I'm the very last person to write Katie Fleming's entry but since I still get emails accusing me of hating her (I don't) as well as disingenuous entries on less objective Wikipedia suggesting that I'm responsible for all sorts of things that I'm not responsible for with regard to Katie, I thought I'd have a go at starting off this article. Of course, Wiki Raider can edited by anyone, so if you disagree with what I have written - change it. Just please don't send me any more hate mail or write any more bizarre things about me on your websites if you disagree :). Thanks [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 10:55, 17 September 2008 (CEST)		I realise that people will think I'm the very last person to write Katie Fleming's entry but since I still get emails accusing me of hating her (I don't) as well as disingenuous entries on less objective Wikipedia suggesting that I'm responsible for all sorts of things that I'm not responsible for with regard to Katie, I thought I'd have a go at starting off this article. Of course, Wiki Raider can edited by anyone, so if you disagree with what I have written - change it. Just please don't send me any more hate mail or write any more bizarre things about me on your websites if you disagree :). Thanks [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 10:55, 17 September 2008 (CEST)
		+
		+	Just to be clear - and there is ample documentation to back this page up - it wasn't the inclusion of Katie and various other people in the credits of Anniversary that sparked comment. It was the GameTap interview. And also to be clear - the controversy was about the "news blackout" coordinated across two or three TR forums on people who wanted to discuss it (not only myself I might add), for which there is also ample documentation. It wasn't about Katie-bashing or envy of Katie, and the (continuing) effort to portray the controversy as all about Katie was (and is) an attempt to divert attention away from the Admins of various forums and to stir up the legion of Katie fans in order to obscure the issue. The description of the controversy given here is not biased - it is merely factual. [[User:Ostercy\|Ostercy]] 09:05, 20 September 2008 (CEST)